Hiring someone with a skill set similar to yours can feel deceptively simple. After all, you know the role well, you've done it yourself, and you know what excellence looks like. But one of the biggest hiring mistakes—especially in technical or specialized roles—is relying too heavily on theoretical questions.
In today’s world, theoretical questions don’t measure real competence. Anyone can Google an answer within seconds. With tools like ChatGPT, it’s even easier. Theory checks may filter out someone completely unprepared, but they do nothing to validate whether a candidate has real, hands-on experience.
So how do you identify the right candidate—especially when you yourself are an expert in the same field? Here's a better way.
Imagine you’re a professional driver trying to hire another driver.
If you ask:
Almost anyone can answer correctly—even if they’ve never sat behind a steering wheel. These questions measure information, not experience.
In a video interview, audio call, or in-person meeting, candidates can still look things up. Theoretical questions simply don't reveal whether someone has ever applied that knowledge under real-world pressure.
An interview is exactly what the word implies: a view into their experiences.
Set clear expectations from the start:
Then ask questions that force the candidate to share genuine situations they've encountered.
“Tell me about a tricky situation you faced on the road where you had to quickly maneuver to avoid danger. What exactly did you do, and why?”
This does several things:
Real practitioners know that in complex scenarios, there’s rarely just one correct answer.
For example, consider this driving scenario:
Ask:
“What are your possible options to bring the car to a safe stop?”
A novice might say:
A real driver might explain:
These are answers only someone with genuine experience can give.
If a candidate struggles to recall an experience, go to their resume:
If they can't speak in detail about something they claim to have worked on, that's a red flag.
In technical fields, you may want to share:
Screen sharing is common. But even in a shared screen scenario, candidates can still reference ChatGPT or online solutions.
The real test isn’t IF they can present a solution—it’s whether they can EXPLAIN it.
Ask:
This exposes genuine understanding far better than written solutions alone.
To stay within 30–60 minutes, be clear:
This helps candidates stay on track and gives you better control of time.
It’s a good practice to:
This creates a better experience and reflects well on your organization.
To truly identify the right candidate:
The right questions don't test what someone knows.
They test what someone has done.
If you follow these principles, you'll consistently filter out pretenders and elevate the people with genuine hands-on competence.